![]() ![]() So, in this scenario, bond sales became the residual funding mechanism used to ensure that the following equation was always in balance.īut this permanent authorization to sell bonds to balance this equation has one caveat, which is that it is subject to a debt limit. After 1917, Congress made it so that the president was always authorized to sell bonds in order to finance any spending that exceeded other revenue sources. Before 1917, Congress financed all of the spending it mandated, including by authorizing each and every bond sale. If he unilaterally forgoes some or all of the spending mandated by Congress in order to stay within the financial constraints, then he has usurped the spending authority that is vested solely in Congress.Īs far as I know, this potential problem has never arisen historically. If he executes the spending by unilaterally financing it through tax hikes, bond sales, or similar, then he has usurped financing authority that is vested solely in Congress. In this scenario, it is impossible for the president to follow the law. There is a potential problem in this structure, which is that Congress could pass laws directing the president to spend a certain amount of money without passing laws to finance that spending. The president is then required to execute these fiscal laws as written. ![]() This power includes the power to raise revenue through taxation and other means, to borrow money, and to engage in public spending. Within the US constitutional system, the power to make laws is vested in Congress. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |